From “Tangerine” to the style of independent film

When I was at an interview, I said when I did my undergrad, the style of films we appreciated were very different from what USC likes. USC is more industrial with a Hollywood style. But at the time, we liked independent style better. Then the interviewer asked me with a questioning look: Can you describe what is the independent film style you mentioned? I was so nervous after hearing the question, thinking I said something wrong.

I do think there is a style of independent films. Sometime the style came without a choice, but sometimes they were choices made by the director. After watching Tangerine last week, I confirmed this thought.

Independent films, most of the time will be compared to Hollywood film by the audience. It normally means films that are not produced by major Hollywood studios, sometimes art films, experimental films.

With the appearances of cheaper digital cameras, non-liner editing softwares, sound mixing software and PC. Making a film becomes more and more easier.

Using non-stars, telling stories of normal life or social issues,showing the mundane details of daily life with low budget, independent films has its unique brand. Films this year like Manchester By The Sea is an example.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

As a result of less budget, independent films tend to use natural light, hand held camera or steady long shots, long dialogue or very limited dialogue.

Because of the usage of smaller cameras and limited lighting. Indie filmmakers are able to show what a real life looks like, bringing the film closer to the audience. Just like what Tangerine did. It shows the real Los Angeles which is very different from the glory DTLA in other films, thanks to the small iPhone 5s provides more instant reaction from the filmmaker with a smaller film set.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

I believe the difference of the style was determined by the different usage of film technologies at the first place.


One thought on “From “Tangerine” to the style of independent film

  1. Ah yes, the always-difficult question – what exactly does “independent” mean? So many of the books on independent film attempt to address this very topic, with varying degrees of success. Is George Lucas’s ‘Attack of the Clones’ an indie film if it was produced apart from the major studios? Thinking about technology in relation to “independence” is definitely an interest of mine, and I think it has long been an interest for independent filmmakers as well, as they themselves are often comparing their work to big studio production (even if only to reject it). I suppose it often comes down to an issue of finances, which is another central question for people who study indie film and the filmmakers themselves. Throwing money at a problem is something Hollywood can and does do, but generally not so with low-budget indie film. Looking at how technology fits into that equation is an interesting approach, especially as the technology continues to develop and, in the process, potentially becomes less of a factor.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s